Sunday, 30 June 2024

VOTE to SAVE and PRESERVE Wildlife -Brian May

 


I posted this on my groups because two Bristol 'wildlife' groups called it "campaigning" again and the rest...it never gets approved or disappears quickly. 

SHAME on you if you call yourself a naturalist or a wildlife lover and you just sit back and do not give a 🤬about the slaughtering to extinction of badgers and the killing of foxes that has set them for extinction or any of the many species of wildlife that are dying out as I write this because it is easier to sit on your ass and just watch TV or You Tube. 

ACT NOW or your children and grand children will only read about many species that are gone by the time they grow up.

Friday, 28 June 2024

Response to Bristol Green Party Council

 Hello.

I am quite honestly shocked the the Green Party has adopted Labours "no budget for it" response. A pity the UK Greens are not as wildlife and environmentally aware as the German Greens. This issue would have been one of importance.

Do you know how many deer are killed on roads in and around Bristol? How manty are badly injured so that they have to be shot in or at the side of roads in front of motorists?

The Bristol Fox Deaths Register currently lists 128 (reported) adult as well as cubs so far for 2024 and that number will likely increase to 300 this year.

The Bristol Badgers Death Register currently lists (reported) 43 adults/cubs.

The badger population is currently (after 300,000 killed in the cull) heading for extinction and the fox is likewise declining to such an extent that even the British Trust for Ornithology believes they should be Red Listed. And otters are not fairing much better and Bristol's otter death rate is not good.

Who in your Green Party is actually actively looking at wildlife issues?  

Another fox was added to the list this morning. I will keep adding to the lists and as far as I am concerned Green Bristol City Council is acting the same as Labour City Council did.

Terry Hooper

Wildlife Road Deaths and Wildlife Over/Underpasses To Save Endangered Species:Green Party Says "NO"

 I prefer not to involve politics on this blog but we are in a deep wildlife crisis and it cannot be ignored.


 Today, 28th June the 'Green Party' finally decided to fob me off with a 'response':

Is there an election this year?
I finally got a reply from the Deputy Leader of the Green City Council and it is just insulting. They have literally run through my email and picked out points I made and pretended that there are plans to deal with them:

"Hello Terry,
"My apologies for the delay in responding. It’s been a very busy month!
"Thank you for raising these concerns, as a Green and an animal lover I share your concerns.
"I’ve been chasing a response from officers for a few weeks – and this is what they’ve provided so far.
“The Nature Conservation Officer is looking in to the feasibility of an otter crossing at Hartcliffe Way.
"Highway Team are considering putting "wildlife crossing" signs in the area. Although, currently there is no budget for these signs.”

"I will keep these issues in my mind,"
Kind regards,
Heather
Heather Mack
Councillor for Lockleaze and Deputy Leader of Bristol City Council
cllr.heather.mack@bristol.gov.uk
07584 202666
I know for a fact that Highways are not looking at an otter wildlife path on Hartcliffe Way and I also know for a fact that they are not looking at "Wildlife Crossing" signs...because Highways told me they were nice ideas but not being looked at as there was no budget and any under/overpass for wildlife would disrupt traffic.
Then, the big "piss off"is adding to "its being looked at" that "there is no budget for this"
Take a look at this from The Bristol Budget Report 2024-2025:
In addressing these challenges, the MTFP sets out our guiding financial principles and good practice arrangements for; delivering sustainable services, to be resilient to future uncertainty, deliver best value and a balanced budget in the medium term. Overall, this report recommends a 2024/25 general fund net expenditure budget of £530.1 million, (a net increase of £46.5 million from the 2023/24 budget) and incorporates targeted revenue investment in priority areas of £55.8 million in 2024/25 to mitigate ongoing and unavoidable pressures.
You can see that they are literally scraping pennies together ðŸ˜•
It is just a Green Party "Who cares?" response and shows they are just as bad as Labour were.

Motorists and development are THE top priorities. Wildlife can be scraped up or left where it was killed.  "I will keep these issues in my mind"...until the tea and biscuits are dished out.
I do not give any leeway to these people any more. After decades of wildlife work the one thing that I have learnt is that politicians ('animal lovers' or not) will never give a damn about wildlife because there are not that many votes in it but there is a lot of money in development on green space sites and wildlife tends to hold up those projects (and money).
That the Green Party is taking Labours old stance is not surprising. They are as damned by their lack of action as Labour were and contributing to habitat destruction as well as sitting idly by as endangered species are literally run over by cars on a daily basis.

***************************************************************

Well, it seems that I was right. Following the council election win by the Green Party at the start of May all of its councillors have gone back to being invisible and uncontactable.

Having given up I sent this email to the Green Party Head and Deputy Head of Bristol City Council:

"I have now tried getting in touch with your Green Party over local wildlife and environment issues since the 8th May. Absolutely no responses.

A large group of people concerned with these issues changed from a Labour vote to help elect a Green run council under the foolish assumption you actually cared about these issues. After much discussion I can inform you that we have collectively decided to not vote Green Party in any future or national elections.

I cannot express just how disappointed I am in the Green Bristol City Council.

Terry Hooper"


I find that with wildlife death mounting up all over the area leaves me far less happy with very slow or no responses from those in authority.

The following was sent to Councillor Carla Denyer head of the Green party which is now in cntrol of Bristol City Council. Attached were copies of the 2023 and 2024 Fox and VBadger Death Registers:

Hello.

I submitted this to the former Mayor on three occasions but only just before the council elections did he respond to say "nothing we can do". My family going back to my grandparents voted Labour all of their lives as have I but along with a lot of other voters who were concerned about Labour's relentless disregard for the environment and wildlife issues decided that a Green vote would be the only choice. We are all hoping, whether people campaigning to save the Western Slopes or other green areas, or involved in wildlife work that the Green Party will step up and meet the challenges and stand with the people of Bristol to make the City a true example of environment and habitat protection.

For your convenience please find attached the Bristol Fox Deaths Register for 2023 as well as the Badger Deaths Register for 2023 maintained by the British Fox and Canid Study (f 1976) and the Bristol Badger Group (f 1994). In summary, for 2023 (and only animals given a location that could be found) some -I should point out that the total number of fox deaths listed herein are not all that died in 2023.
The total number of foxes killed on Bristol roads in 2023 was 257 and these include cubs, pregnant vixens and dog foxes.
The total known number of badgers killed in Bristol for 2023 was 53.
Our work now includes recording deaths of otters which totalled around 6 for 2023.
We do not keep a record of deer and other mammals/birds killed on Bristol roads but the number is high.
We know that for 2024 the total fox deaths up to 7th May stand at 83 and one of these was a heavily pregnant vixen. We have also just recorded the first otter death of 2024 at Lawrence Weston. Badger deaths up to 7th May stands at 36 and these include lactating sows meaning that cubs likely also died. Again, I will attach copies for your convenience.
One black spot for wild life deaths is the Hick's Gate stretch of road -deer, badgers, foxes etc. Saturday 27th January saw four fox deaths on this stretch of road.
For otter deaths we know that the major black spot is the Hartcliffe Way which sees the highest death rate. Looking through the registers you will note that certain areas always crop up and Downend is a particular black spot for foxes and badgers.
I am aware that it will cost, financially, but I would like Bristol City Council to consider the possibility of wildlife underpasses being installed in the main hot spots -Hick's Gate and Hartcliffe Way as the rate of wildlife death on these stretches is so high and otters and badgers are protected species. Perhaps "Wildlife Crossing" signs to alert drivers might also help.
We are currently looking at environmental crises and concentrating on wildlife areas but we are not looking at the animals themselves and how the impact of their deaths are affecting the environment -foxes as hunters are not wholly carnivorous but will catch and eat large numbers of rats and mice and in some cities around the world they are seen as far more effective than rodenticides(as are feral cats). If the numbers of foxes and badgers continue to drop then we will be seeing them, in the City, as rare and they took a long time to recover after 94% died off in the 1994/1995 mange outbreak.
So, please, give the idea of some type of underpass or overpass for wildlife serious consideration as in many parts of the world they have been adopted as essential.
I look forward to your responses when convenient.
Regards
Terry Hooper-Scharf

I have made a couple of attempts of contacting someone at the Green Party but that seems almost impossible by phone. It's far better to give all of the facts in writing and documents for a decision to be made.

Sadly, many of us who decided the mess of a Labour council had to go and so we switched our vote to the Greens. People have tried to raise several issues with the Greens but all note a very obvious absence of any representatives. I will not post the pithy comments made. As a second email seemed in order I again emailed Cllr Denyer attaching the first message:

"Hello. As I have not had a preliminary response to the email of 8th May I wondered whether there was someone appointed at the council who can handle the matters raised? Since writing the number of fox deaths in Bristol has risen to 100 and badger deaths stand at 37. This excludes deer and other animals (such as deer) killed in and around Bristol roads. At6 the very minimum some consideration should be given to "Warning Wildlife Crossing" notices on the main wildlife death spots. Some serious consideration needs to be given wildlife crossings whether over or under roads as at the current rate we are losing wildlife at an alarming rate and I would consider a new Green controlled council far better suited to handling this issue than the previous Labour controlled council."

Having at one time been a big supporter of the Green Party in Germany, perhaps I am expecting too much from a British Green Party? People are not even reporting deer they hit with their cars and we seriously need to take some action because wildlife killed by cars is getting out of hand.

Saturday, 8 June 2024

ALL Books Are Priced For Region and Printed and Posted in Region -NO International Shipping

 




To make it clear: 

1.  if you order a book from the online store it does not involve international shipping. Books are printed in your region -that's how print on demand works.  

2.  The price of the book should be shown in your own currency.

3.  Obviously your local postal rates apply and there are options for tracked, special delivery and untracked (the least expensive) postage from within your region.

Ordered in your region, printed in your region and delivered by the postal system in your region.  It could not be more simple.

One important thing to note is that third party sellers will state "post free" and that is a lie. You often pay 30-75% more on a book ordered through a third party seller than from the online store. The reason is because the third party seller HAS to buy from the online store and the selling price usually covers two postal payments -0from store to them and then to you.  

People have purchased from third party sellers and not gotten their books or have had to wait over a month for them to arrive. At that point they contact me and it is all very simple: they tried to rob me of a sale and bought a book at a far more expensive price because they read "post free". That is important because if you buy from a third party seller you are removing the small profit I make on a book. Also, ordering from the online store is not just cheaper but, even though it has never happened since I started selling in 2009,  I can actually look into why you have not had your book delivered. Third party seller -your tough luck.

Support the creator and publisher not third party scammers.




I have asked to clarify which countries books can be ordered from as I know someone in Hong Kong and China were interested and it looks like you can order from there. According to the  print company:

We do NOT ship to the following countries/territories:


  • Belarus

  • Region of Crimea

  • Cuba

  • Iran

  • Johnston Island

  • North Korea

  • Russia

  • Saint Pierre Et Miquelon

  • South Sudan

  • Sudan

  • Syria

  • Republic Of Turkmenistan

  • Ukraine

  • Wake Islands

  • Yemen Arab Republic

  • Venezuela

Hope that helps!

Tuesday, 4 June 2024

Natural England To Continue Badger Culls Despite Scientific Advice

 Fifty (50) years after starting out as a naturalist I never expected to one day announce that Natural England were overseeing the deliberate extinction of badgers agenda.  This HAS to stop because by 20230 England will only have pockets of urban badgers left.


This from The Badger trust https://www.badgertrust.org.uk/post/shocking-news-as-natural-england-issues-supplementary-cull-licences-against-scientific-advice

Shocking news as Natural England issues supplementary cull licences against scientific advice

Natural England CEO and Chair overrule their own scientific advice that supplementary badger culling will not work.


Badger Trust has today urgently written to the Chief Executive of Natural England to follow the scientific guidance of its own Director of Science, Dr Peter Brotherton, and stop the badger cull with immediate effect.


Documents obtained by independent ecologist Tom Langton show that Brotherton’s scientific advice was NOT to carry out the supplementary badger cull from 1 June 2024 as,


“...based on the evidence, I can find no justification for authorising further supplementary badger culls in 2024 for the purpose of preventing the spread of disease and recommend against doing so”.

Despite this advice, Natural England’s Chief Executive Marian Spain and Chair Tony Juniper have decided to proceed with supplementary badger culling and have ordered the killing of thousands of badgers to go ahead in 17 existing and 9 unnamed new zones.  


This decision is shocking news.  Badger Trust can see only one reason in the documents for this decision  – that it would upset the farming industry if they did not. This seems to point to a politically based decision rather than a scientific one, contradicting the principles of evidence-based decision-making.


Peter Hambly, Executive Director of Badger Trust, said,


“This shocking decision will lead to thousands of needless badger deaths, causing significant disruption to ecosystems and putting nature further under threat; and yet it will not reduce bTB in cattle." 

"Natural England must follow the scientific advice and call for an immediate stop to the badger cull. Every day it delays means the slaughter of more badgers and their cubs.”


In another blow to Natural England and Defra’s strategy of targeting badgers, Brotherton also added,


“It is disappointing that the recent publication by Birch et al 2024 has been widely reported as providing evidence that badger culling reduces the incidence of bTB by 56%, when in fact the study shows the overall impact of implementing a range of bTB control measures, not culling alone.  Further research to establish the relative disease reduction contributions of the different control methods is needed.”


Hambly added,


“Dr Brotherton’s comments on the ”Birch Report” are in line with what Badger Trust and independent scientists have been pointing out for months. 


"It’s cattle that spread the overwhelming majority of bTB, and it’s cattle where bTB control measures should be focused.  This view is widely accepted among independent scientists, further questioning the effectiveness of badger culling as a bTB control method." 

"We are already seeing localised badger extinction in heavily culled areas. The decision to proceed with slaughtering badgers has significant implications for the badger population and the natural environment at a time of nature crisis.


The continual scapegoating of the badger by people who are meant to protect nature continues to shock us. They must stop the killing now.”

"Experts" Ignore Historical FACT?

  It is often the case that that dogma is so entrenched on a certain subject, as well as money invested, that no matter what factual evidenc...