Translate

Monday, 13 July 2026

APHA, WIIS and even Police Wildlife Officers Just Cannot Be Interested in Wildlife Crime

 When I say that there is no respect or interest in wildlife in the UK here is an example so that you understand.


Above: The buzzard in question.

A person whose property/land is dedicated to re-wilding has a vixen collapse on the property and poison is suspected -awaiting toxicology report.  Then a young female buzzard that has been in good health and flying about if found dead. A crow is found dead. A badger is found dead. None car related but raising concerns.

The Animal Plant Health Agency will NOT look at the buzzard and carry out a post mortem examination (PME) unless it has a referral.  The APHA:

The Animal and Plant Health Agency, formerly known as the Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency, is an executive agency of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs of the United Kingdom.

As I found years ago the APHA really does not want to get involved and is very bureeaucratic.

In this case the events took place within the West Mercia Police area and up until the early 2000s I had regular contact with wildlife officers both senior and lower ranks. They were very helpful and took their work seriously and often looked into incidents I was working on. This is their current statement on the fuction of wildlife crime officers:

West Mercia Police Wildlife Crime Officers (WCOs) are regular police officers who have completed specialist training alongside their day-to-day duties. Their function is to investigate, prevent, and tackle crimes against protected animals, plants, and habitats while advising rural communities

These officers work alongside organizations like the National Wildlife Crime Unit and Natural England to fulfill several core functions: 
Unfortunately, wyhen the land owner had a "conference" with the wildlife officer -W Mercia decided 9pm was the most convenient time for thi9s- he basically had no idea about wildlife law or what he could do.
This is why so much wildlife crime is never investigated and why badger baiting and killing of birds of prey just sit around.  In case anyone is wondering about the protection status of a buzzard in the UK:
"....buzzards are fully protected in the UK. Under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, it is an illegal offense to intentionally kill, injure, or take a buzzard, or to destroy their nests and eggs. 
While there are strict legal exceptions—such as licensing for specific airports or to prevent serious agricultural damage—the conservation of these birds remains heavily enforced."
Any wildlife officer should know this -the fact that buzzards and eagles as well as hawks are being illegally killed in the UK is nbo big secret and even makes the internet news and newspapers.  If only the officer knew how to work a computer he would have found:
"If you suspect a wildlife crime (e.g., poisoning, shooting, or trapping)
Buzzards are fully protected by law. If you find a dead bird alongside an unnatural carcass (like a poisoned bait) or note signs of physical injury: 
  • Call the Police: Dial 999 if the crime is happening right now. Dial 101 to report the incident if the suspects are no longer there. Ask for a crime reference number.
  • Notify the RSPB: Contact the RSPB Investigations Unit by calling their Raptor Crime Hotline at 0300 999 0101 or by emailing crime@rspb.org.uk. 
3. What to do at the scene
  • Do not touch or move the bird to avoid contamination or destroying evidence.
  • Take photos or a video of the bird and its exact surroundings.
  • Note the exact location (use map grid references or a "what3words" location if possible).
  • Record any suspects or suspicious vehicles if witnessed. 
If you would like to remain anonymous, you can pass your information to Crimestoppers by calling 0800 555 111"
As it happens I have advised that the land owner contact the Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme (WIIS):

The Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme (the Scheme) makes enquiries into the death or illness of wildlife, pets and beneficial invertebrates that may have resulted from pesticide poisoning. The scheme has two objectives:

  • To provide information to the regulator on hazards to wildlife and companion animals and beneficial invertebrates from pesticides; and
  • To enforce the correct use of pesticides, identifying and penalising those who deliberately or recklessly misuse and abuse pesticides.

In practice "companion animals" usually refers to cats and dogs, and "beneficial invertebrates" refers to honeybees, bumble bees and earthworms. Also included in the Scheme are suspect baits, where it is thought that pesticides have been inappropriately applied or used, and spillages of pesticides where this poses a risk to wildlife or companion animals.

The Scheme is essentially a monitoring tool to inform the pesticide approval process. However, where there is clear evidence of a breach of pesticide law enforcement action may be taken.

Cases accepted for further investigation usually fall into one of the following categories:

  • Approved use - a pesticide is used in accordance with its conditions of authorisation;
  • Misuse – the product has not been used according to the conditions of its authorisation, but often just carelessly or accidently, without the intention of harming animals;
  • Abuse – a pesticide has been deliberately used in an illegal manner to poison, or to try to poison animals.

In some cases pesticides may be found but the origin of the substance is unclear and the cause of death will be unknown or unspecified.

How the Scheme works

Where poisoning is suspected, a combination of field work, veterinary examination and chemical analysis is used to try to determine the underlying cause of death. The Scheme is operated independently in all four countries of the United Kingdom using the same free phone number given above. Only the reporting of results is co-ordinated and reported here. Those organisations responsible for the investigation and enforcement of incidents are:

In England the Chemicals Regulation Division of Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has overall responsibility for the policy of the scheme which is run on HSE"s behalf by Natural England. The following pages provide details of the investigation procedures followed by Natural England and the vertebrate and invertebrate flowcharts provide a guide to the reporting and investigation process.

In Wales the scheme is run by the Welsh Government.

In Scotland the Science and Advice for Scottish Agriculture (SASA) and in Northern Ireland the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development

Again, the WIIS can be a pain to kick into gear but they can request the APHA Post Morten Centre (scattered around the country) to carry out a PME.

One badger found dead with no real obvious cause. Sad.  A fox dying mysteriously after collapsing for no reason away from traffic. Coincidence. A crow and then a buzzard dying all within a small area SHOULD start alarm bells ringing. 

But this is the UK and you have to telephone (never email as the bodies involved simply will not respond) argue a case after citing the situation then get passed on to someone else whjere you go through it all again. I know, it took years of arguing before fox PMEs were started in Bristol.

The wildlife officer and what hye needs to do has it all laid out in front of him/her. Even numbers where a call can be made and advice sought.

The UK is a mess when it comes to wildlife care as well as investigation of unusual deaths where p[oisons may be involved. In the Bristol area we have had a snared otter (thrown by the roadside to hide the fact), snared foxes and even one fox torn up after a man in a public park set his dog on it deliberately then walked off. Wildlife crimes that have progressed to absolutely nothing. No investigation just "intelligence gathered" (police speak for sitting on their asses and just making notes). One Police Community Service Officer in Bristol did the right thing when two foxes and a cat died in a small area. People suggested poisoning: the officer bagged up the foxes and submitted them as evidence in possible wildlife crime. THAT is what a wildlife officer should do.

In Bristol local allotment owners who were wildlife friendly reported finding three dead foxes the same day. It took a couple phone calls but the highly publicised new PWO went there, made some notes and was told the carcasses were 300 yards away in case they were needed to test for poison. He had no interest what so ever in walking 300 yards for the bagged up foxes "I've gathered intelligence to go forward with" he told the people. My phone calls to him? Never got a response. THREE dead foxes in one day in an allotment where nothing poisonous was used as iut was rewilding in nature. THREE potential poisoned foxes ignored.

re. the land owner and the buzzard: "Still trying to speak with them . Buzzard is now at APHA but they won't process until WIIS confirm. They will not accept a vets referral. You can no longer speak directly to WIIS , you can only leave a message and they will get back to you in a few days . Toxicology testing is only done at the gov lab at York and no results from anywhere else recognised . It takes weeks and months for any results."

Which all means that the result of reporting the badger, fox, crow and buzzard which all died within a 500 yard area (which would be viewed as very suspicious in anyone's book) will just bhave been killed and whoever was responsible gets away with it.

It is the same story all over the country. Incompetence amongst (not all) police wildlife officers, lack of any determination by any body with authority and it is the animal and birds that suffer.

Sunday, 12 July 2026

Will My Files Be Lost??

 


Anything to do with the late Mike Collins and his work while running the Avon Badger Group seem lost. Avon Wildlife Trust just don't respond and BRERC claims all the data was returned to a group that ceased before 1994 and either a dead man or...or they are lying?

No photos seem to exist of Collins and I wanted to do a detailed historical lo0ok at ABG and his work. The one remaining member I could find (in her 80s) stated she never got any papers back and she also refuses to forward what she has/knows "I shall take them proudly to my grave".......
So anything Avon Badger Group is lost or being kept locked away.
Any of my stuff badger or fox and wild canid and Exotic Animal Register is destinned to go (I am going to box it all up in the next few weeks) to The Extinct Fox and Wild Cat Museum as I know my family have no interrest and it would all be burnt or binned and thertefore 50 years work would be gone.

Saturday, 11 July 2026

The Actual Number of Badger Deaths in Bristol

 



 I did a recent post on the Fox Project Bristol and my blog about reported so KNOWN fox deaths and what the actual total might be.

 https://terryhoopernaturalist.blogspot.com/2026/07/182-reported-dead-foxes-total-is-higher.html

 That was scary enough but then I wondered whether statistics could guestimate the actual number  of dead badgers in the City and County of Bristol (yes, for those who did not know Bristol is not just a City). So far we have had 73 reported death so ....

The actual number of badgers killed is likely much higher than 73 . Experts estimate that up to (50,000\) badgers die on UK roads yearly. Studies show that for every dead badger seen and reported 2-3 others often die nearby or off-road from their injuries. Therefore, 73 observed deaths could mean 146  to 219 actually died.

First off it used to be 100,000 then 60,000now 50,000 is the estimate. I do not believe that after the cull took 300,000 badgers that 50,000 are currently dying. The population is so low and even though no longer present in certain areas (due to the cull) that 50,000 each year would mean we have 2-3 years before badgers are extinct.

I have asked Highways England and they do not record what dead animals their teams remove from roads. A simple email reading "Orpington  23 06 2026 badger" (or "fox" could be sent. How long does that take?  But local highway authorities such as Bristol City (Green) Council's Street Clean Team will not even cooperate: they just pick up and send for incineration.

That said, sadly, a total of 146+/- would not surprise me. And remember this is just road deaths not death by rodenticide, snaring or illegal killing by local badger men and badger baiting (yes, that still goes on).

Rather like foxes and the fast decreasing UK population I think it time English badgers were moved onto the Red List as a species facing extinction. 

Poisoned Foxes? Get The Evidence Before Stating "Poisoned"

 



This was posted to The Greenwich Wildlife Network:

Fox Guardians

WARNING to wildlife lovers and pet parents in Broadstairs! There is been a string of fox poisonings in the Stone Bay area (Eastern Esplanade, town centre end). So far 7 (!) cubs and 1 vixen have been found dead in the garden of a fox lover in quick succession.

The cases which constitute a wildlife crime have been reported to the wildlife officer at Kent police.

If one of your fox friends arrives and is struggling to breathe and seems wobbly, get them to a vet as soon as possible. Briar House Vets have been informed about the poisonings and Kent Wildlife Rescue Service could help getting the fox rescued.

If you find a dead fox in your garden, do not handle the body as the police would only consider collecting it for a postmortem if it was not 'contaminated' by being handled. Poisoned foxes often have a frothy discharge caming from their mouth.

I know this is challenging but do take pictures from various angles and call to police quoting crime reference number #09-1286.

Currently this case is "closed" due to lack of evidence but that could change because someone somewhere may know something.

If you know something, be the voice for foxes and speak up. If we don't show compassion, what is it that defines us?!

The vixen in this picture (not included in this post –TH) is a juvenile called Hazel. She is such a sweet little soul that I had the pleasure to look after over the last 2 weeks. She lives just a few gardens away from where the seven fox cubs that were of the same age as her were cruelly poisoned.

At 5 months old, their lives had only just begun. Their lives were not our to take. I and Hazel's guardian Jill are so very worried for her and her family. Be safe little one!

 

I responded:

Hi.

I have run the British Fox Study since 1976 and headed the onmly UK post mortem study of unusual deaths in foxes. The first question I have to ask is whether there has been a post mortem (in suspected poisoning cases you can get free PMs via the Animal Plant Health Agency) to identify poisonings?

The reason I ask is that when we started our work we had foxes that were found dead and unmarked in feeders gardens, foxes seen staggering, coughing and then collapsing. All were suspected poisonings.

As it turns out all were victims of cars -no broken bones found but all injuries were internal. Some were even found to be down to unsuspected illnesses. It can never be put down to poison until a post mortem as that will involve tests etc.

In case anyone is interested in what our study found I will include a link. https://foxandcanids.blogspot.com/.../bristol-foxes-study... I can be PM'd

I should have pointed out  that the discharge/froth from the mouth could also indicate thoracic damage. The only way you can 100% state poison is after testing.

 I also need to point out that Kent Police are talking complete and utter crap if they did say they would only handle a fox that has not been touch. I could use stronger words. Kent as a county is not known for liking foxes and I suspect the police just cannot be bothered because it was a fox.

A post mortem examines the internal organs and test samples are taken to check for poison and to identify what it was –if a crime or suspected crime the police tend to do nothing if my experience over the last few decades proves anything. If it is a rodenticide then it can become an investigation by the Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme (WIIS). The person recovering the fox, the lab technicians etc all handle the fox and there has NEVER been the line “If touched we can do nothing” –a police Community Service Officer collected two foxes and a cat in a suspected poison case and that was after reportees had moved the animals to keep safe. In that case all turned out to be road casualties.

The knee jerk “It’s poison!” statement once spread, as we found in Bristol, attracts almost hysteria and local journalists love a “juicy story” – “The Bristol Fox Poisoner(s)” was a result of absolutely no evidence but people stating as fact anything they heard. 

At least three vets with different foxes stated “Its poison” –all foxes were found to have internal injuries caused by cars.

182 Reported Dead Foxes -The Total Is Higher

 


I get used to the comments from morons (I am no longer polite about this) that the more foxes killed on the road the better for gardens, homes and the environment.

I am not joking. I once pointed out to a woman whowrote this that foxes were good for the environment and the best pest controllers for rats and micve that you can have. "I'd sooner have the rats!" was t6he response.
Another person who did everything possible to discourage foxes BECAUSE "I have a garden rat" ignored all the advice and told me "No one asked for your opinion -it's my garden!" About 9 months later she was posting for advice as "my garden is over run with rats".
AQt the moment we have recorded 182 known fox deaths in the City and there is a way of trying to guage from that the actual number that have died -I will upload the document on assessment to files).
Hold on to your seats:
If 182 foxes are counted as road casualties, the true number is likely much higher. Wildlife studies show that reported roadkill usually accounts for only 1/12th to 1/16th of actual casualties. This means the probable actual number of foxes killed is between 2,184\ and 2,912
That is terrifying to even think about with a national fox population that is declining at a steady rate 0thanks to humans. I would like to thyink the number is lower at 300+ which is still far too high but when drivers go speeding during the day and night and kill pets and don't stop or report and even hit people....at night it is free reign!

Wednesday, 1 July 2026

Red Squirrels. Grey Squirrels, Extinctions, Dogma and Continued Extermination

update: Two people who worked "forestry" (ie lumber cutting and maintenance) asked about what taxidermists would offer for red squirrels as "they shoot a lot in the forestry here in Scotland".  I asked which forestry and was immediately no longer on the taxidermy group!  So killing red squirrels is still ongoing.

  Back on 14th March, 2021 I posted an item titled This Is HUMAN aided Evolution NOT "Invasive Species"  and in this I discussed the fact that so many Old British wildlife had hit extinction by the 1860s.  If you read the books and publications of the 19th century this is stated and also hinted at.  My thanks also to my colleague LM.

We know that the Old fox species as well as the Old wild cat species had declined so much through hunting that they became extinct circa the 1860s. At the same time hunting had wiped out of populations to the point that they became extinct.  We know that the hare population dropped so low that in some parts of the UK hares had to be imported to continue the hare coursing 'sport'.  In other regions deer also declined and more were imported from Europe -this is all a matter of historical record.

Even today, the estimated hare population of 579,000 is probably a vast over estimate or an outright fake figure to give the impression that hunting has no effect on population. There are some pro-hunt groups using grand titles including "conservation" who have only one interest and that is to include blood sports.As far as hares go:

""GB Red List: n/a. Although a species of conservation concern, brown hares have minimal legal protection because they're considered a game species and can be shot throughout the year, including through their breeding season. They are the only game species in the UK without a closed season (when hunting is prohibited)."

We know that there are many 'fun' shooters who basically go o9ut nightly to find something to kill so they will undoubtedly take hares without even considering that there may be young that will die because the mother was killed.  And the same thing that wiped out other species is occurring now and that is breeding pairs are killed so..no new generation.  Farmers also shoot hares and even some who profit from it by selling to taxidermists and taxidermists selling on:

It is quite safe to say the hare population is not at the levels claimed and killing for 'fun' as well as financial gain is rife.

Which brings us to the subject of squirrels and particularly red squirrels. I have been accused several times of falsely stating red squirrels were introduced to the UK after the Old Red squirrels were wiped out. Apparently I am using that to justify Grey squirrels being here. This is, of course, the usual uneducated drivel people keep putting out to deny whatever they want; in this case it is 'fact' in their minds (many knowing it is an outright lie) that grey squirrels have wiped out red squirrels.  These people have obviously not carried out even  basic research.
From my 2021 post:

"A few home truths first: humans introduced the grey squirrel mainly as a novelty specimen for estates and menageries. As with other human interferences with nature an unnatural evolution took place. What they like to call the "survival of the fittest" -though this is only applied when it is an animal humans want to encourage for some reason.

photo (c)2024 respective copyright owner

"Another truth is that humans -game keepers, country squires and the wood industry have been trapping, snaring, poisoning and shooting red squirrels for a long time ("shooting a few brace before lunch"  -"brace" being a pair- was a little bit of 'fun sport'.  From 1977 until DEFRA attempted to stop my being a Partner Against Wldlife Crimes (PAWS) in 2015 (police forces do still consult me) I had to speak to pest controllers, game keepers, estate managers, farmers and estate owners and one after another would refer to the "pests" or "vermin" they had to take care of and one of these was the red squirrel. 

"Why the squirrels?" I would ask. "Vermin" was the response 99% of the time but the other 1% found it a "fun shoot". I soon became aware that local authorities, DEFRA and the police were turning a blind eye using a few down pat excuses about private property etc. Red squirrels are classed a endangered and even the Young Peoples Trust For the Environment continues the lie of the grey menace.

https://ypte.org.uk/factsheets/squirrel-red/territory

In 1945 there was a huge red squirrel population compared to that of the grey as this map from Wildlife Trusts demonstrates https://www.wildlifetrusts.org/saving-species/red-squirrels

Red squirrels distribution map


Red and grey squirrels distribution in the British Isles in 1945 and 2010. © Craig Shuttleworth/RSST

photo (c)2024 respective copyright owner

So how did the Greys start winning so much territory from the Reds and why? Simple; following the as outlined in The Gazette  https://www.thegazette.co.uk/all-notices/content/102333

"The Forestry Commission was founded to restore the nation’s timber reserves in the wake of World War 1. Here's how 100 years of forestry has helped to shape our landscape.

In September 1919, the first Forestry Act, which created the Forestry Commission and recognised the importance of forestry to the UK, came into force.

The beginnings

By the end of World War 1, the UK’s timber supply was much depleted. Britain’s forests had already suffered a steady decline since the Middle Ages, and the additional strain of the war – especially trench warfare – left the nation’s woodlands in a state of disrepair.

From a countryside that was once largely forest, just 5 per cent of tree cover remained, and urgent action was required to address growing concerns.

In 1918, the Acland Committee reported to then prime minister, David Lloyd George, that an organisation with state backing would be the most effective way of restoring and restocking the nation’s forests.

On 1 September 1919, the Forestry Act came in to force, establishing the Forestry Commission and granting it responsibility to look after woods across England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales (Gazette issue 31837).

By Christmas of the same year, the first Forestry Commission trees had been planted at Eggesford in Devon, turning the tide for post-war woodlands, and paving the way for the future of forestry in Britain.

Post-war planting

In the years that followed, the Commission was given the confidence and freedom to focus on acquiring and planting new woodland. Hundreds of thousands of acres were planted, but more turbulent times lay ahead.

As tensions mounted across Europe, the Commission had to draw up felling plans in the event of another war. The Forest of Dean and New Forest were hit hardest, and while scores of trees were felled, the Commission continued to expand; growing its workforce and planting more forests.

The subsequent decades witnessed a dramatic increase in productivity for the Commission, as forests were expanded due to fuel demand for a burgeoning timber trade.

Technologies and mechanical equipment simultaneously improved, alongside a growing awareness of public recreation needs, and the importance of conservation for wildlife and the environment.

Woodland grants schemes, which had existed since the formation of the Commission, evolved and provided different incentives. These included awards for broadleaf planting, and for landowners who considered public access"


"Despite all the talk of preserving red squirrel habitat the one thing officials and various  organisations keep quiet about is "the squirrel as a pest" -damage to young saplings and mature "timber" -business and estates lose money. Get rid of the squirrels while 'protecting' habitats (until the wood there is needed).

"The Grey squirrel is often cited as the "perfect example" of what authorities like to term "invasive species" and these need "eradication" (killing). Odd that the red squirrel population is stabilising and not just due to the mass killings of grey squirrels.  Greys have found towns and gardens far better habitats -bird feeders and a very wide selection of foods.  Last year the squirrels coming to my garden had young but their nesting area was in the same set of conifers as collared dove and a magpie nest. The magpies moved out so you might think the collared dove nests did not last long. However, the collared doves had a record number of young -the local population has seen an increase in a year and at one point earlier this year some 8-12 could be found on my feeders. The squirrels had good food supplies including my prized lilies (it took 10 years before they flowered and last year six were ready to flower but in the space of an early morning all the flowers were eaten) but if you set up a wildlife garden...."


When I wrote the above I was misled since the red squirrel population has not started recovering. In fact under the disguise of "rewilding" and "re-introducing species" pine marten have been introduced into areas populated by red squirrel and even polecats. Pine marten and introduced wild cats will make a dent in any squirrel population so add them to humans and the likelihood that red squirrels are recovering seems dubious.  

However, the unproven statements of red squirrel recovery are readily accepted by the public who really do not care that much anyway; I cite the fact that foxes are now on a very steep population decline and that 3000,000 badgers have been legally killed for political and not scientific reasons and.. not big protest from the nation of animal lovers). 

Red squirrels are still secretly available for taxidermists to buy and rarer white and black squirrels on one Hampshire estate ...well, taxidermists are jumping at the chance to buy any examples killed and there are fixed price lists that they have so this is a thriving business. Again, taxidermists stamping their feet and claiming this does not happen -we have recorded the evidence and those selling and buying and on what platform. Sadly, as before, humans will be pushing red squirrels to extinction and their species to blame is sorted -the grey squirrel.  Greys are shot in droves by Red Squirrel preservation groups and there are some dirty secrets there.

Look at this Annual statement of the Highland Squirrel Club for the year ending 31st December, 1917. The club had some 41 members who owned approximately 43,660 acres of woods and paid subscriptions totalling £48 1s 9d. There were 3,998 squirrels killed on these estates for which bonuses of £49 19s 6d were paid.  The main reason was, of course, the 'fun' of shooting animals but they also saw the red squirrel as a threat along the same lines as grey squirrels are today. Rather like foxes, etc., etc., etc., red squirrels were wiped out, re-introduced and then faced several near extinctions. 

Take this as just one example as not all reintroductions were public or even widely publicised as it was no one else's business. In 1844, Lady Lovat persuaded the government to re-introduce red squirrels in the Highlands. However, typically, their numbers multiplied rapidly as in fact did their outward migration. Guess what? In response to the damage caused to woodlands, a Highland Squirrel Club was formed with the purpose of hunting, trapping, and killing the squirrels. Financial incentives were provided for those who sent in squirrel tails. There is a very ironic side to this all story and that is that it was the Lovat Estate which exterminated the highest numbers

 For further information about this item and the collection to which it belongs, please email the Highland Archive Service

PERIOD: 1910s

SOURCE: Highland Archive Centre

COLLECTION: Highland Squirrel Club 1916-1920 /



Above a chart showing the number of squirrels killed from 1903 to 1941and below Highland Squirrel Club Report for 1917 p 2


There can be no denying that red squirrels were wiped out, reintroduced and wiped out again  until some clung on and out of the way of the gunmen. It is interesting to see just how the Red squirrel was described as a threat in the same way modern advocates describe the Grey and the solution is always the same; kill them.  

This is the Blood Red Island where humans wiped out species by the score, reintroduced the species again to once more wipe out and from the early 20th century on an outright campaign was launched to wipe out the true history of what was done and this has become dogma.  Very little of what we find in the UK today whether bird or mammal is going to not be found with European DNA of that species.   To actually state DNA and other study conclusions as fact and showing that British species of today are and always have been the same as those of Europe is pure nonsense. Yes, the DNA results are correct for the 21st century but pre-1900, if you could find any remnants of Old British species of deer or hare, they would have been different. Old foxes and Old wild cats as well as the Old wolves that were wiped out would have all been unique island species but the wolf was killed to extinction first and the fox and wild cat almost simultaneously.

The extinctions/near extinctions of wildlife in countries far away are always popular to point to and pompously spout "we must help you save your native wildlife -once it is gone it is gone forever!"  Coming from people who are employed at museums and universities this is all rather rich and perhaps they ought to look at the UKs wildlife history?

 People in glass houses should not throw stones"

APHA, WIIS and even Police Wildlife Officers Just Cannot Be Interested in Wildlife Crime

 When I say that there is no respect or interest in wildlife in the UK here is an example so that you understand. Above: The buzzard in ques...