Translate

Wednesday, 7 January 2026

Wildlife blog stats 2026 -some surprises

 



Looking at which countries visit my blogs most in the last 7 days so lower than normal due to Christmas and New Year. If it were dependent on UK views and it's "nation of animal lovers" it would make posting pointless. That there are no UK figures for the badger blog says a lot but December did see 368 views and out of those 2 were from the UK.

It is somewhat depressing but reaffirms that interest in wildlife appears confined to "clean" and comfortable TV shows.

Interest in the Fox Study PM report solicited no comments or interest from UK wildlife rescues.  A look at the figures for last year's fox and badger deaths in Bristol solicited no interest from any Bristol wildlife group -or anyone else.

This local and national disinterest reflects the fact that no one (individuals or wildlife rescues) has had the slightest interest in cooperating in even the most basic way.

The Ashton Vale Bristol Wildlife: UK comes in 12th

Singapore    413

United States  82

Germany      35

China          21

Hong Kong    15

Argentina     7

Brazil     6

France     6

Sweden     5

India       4

Vietnam     4

United Kingdom     3

Ireland      3

Israel       3

Mexico      3

Uzbekistan      3

Bangladesh     2

Colombia        2

Philippines     2

other               4

 

British Fox and Wild Canid Study (started in December 2025) UK no show

United States    9

Other                 5

 

Extinct Fox and Wild Cats Museum (set up late 2025)

United States    9

Singapore         6

United Kingdom    3

Other        3

 

Fox Wild Cat and Wolverine Study

Singapore   238

United States   158

Hong Kong     78

Finland     70

China        63

Germany     34

Brazil        32

India       24

Australia        18

Türkiye     18

Argentina    16

France        12

United Kingdom     11

Bangladesh          9

Pakistan          9

Saudi Arabia       9

Philippines          8

Ecuador          7

Lebanon          7

Other             166

 

Terry Hooper Naturalist

United States    108

Singapore          37

United Kingdom   26

India                9

Hong Kong        7

Brazil                6

France       6

Saudi Arabia      6

Türkiye      6

Other       83


Bristol Badger Group

United States      11

Hong Kong       4

Singapore          3

Pakistan             2

Argentina          1

Spain     1

India      1

Other     2

 

Total views:    Bristol Badger Group                  1761

                        Ashton Vale Bristol Wildlife      59451

                        British Fox and Wild Canid        479

                        Extinct Fox Wild Cat Museum   391

                        Fox Wild Cat Wolverine Study  168170

                        Terry Hooper Naturalist             15719

 

                       Combined Total Views                245,971

 

Considering that I am not a publicised author (I have written books), am not on TV or have a You Tube channel to attract views that is quite a surprising total and I ought to point out that views from certain countries are never included by Blogger.

If the books sold or there were backers the work continue and more progress be made but no one wants to back fox research  or any type of grass roots level research and as for people in the UK helping to fund work I think the statistics showing the level of interest answers that question.

Tuesday, 6 January 2026

1575 Warning About Fox Extinction

 


In A Fox-Hunting Anthology: Selections from The Writers of the 18th, 19th and 20th CENTURIES (1928) edited by E. D. Cuming on page xiv of his introduction we read, when he refers to a squire-cum-'sportsman':

"He has his troubles, it is true ; scarcity of foxes is perhaps the worst ; it has been so for generations before his time ands is to be for generations after.  For which we have the evidence of Ralph Holinshed, his Chronicles, published 1575 : he says of fox and badger:-

   "'We have some but no great store -such is the scarcity of them here in England -so earnestly are the inhabitants bent to root them out, that except it had been to bear thus with the recreations of their superiors- it could otherwise have been chosen but that they should have been utterly destroyed by many years agone.' "

in The Experienc'd Huntsman by Arthur Stringer (Belfast, 1714)Stringer wrote:

"As to the Fox, he who lives in a Country where Foxes are plenty, ought fore several Reasons to hunt them: First, That the Fox is a more noble Chace than the Hare :  Secondly, That in Hunting the Fox, you do good to your self, to your Neighbours or Tenants, and to the Country in general, by killing such a Vermine as is a nuisance to the Neighbourhood where he frequents."

The question has to be how, if the number of Old fox types was very low to the point that they were almost extinct and therefore 'sport' was hard to get, did foxes survive?  Firstly, as Holinshed wrote; locals were forbidden to kill all the animals because they were stopping the Chace (hunt) of their 'betters'.  I think that based on all the works from that period gamekeepers began the task of protecting foxes and stabling them whilst keeping them wary of people -I detailed this in The Red Paper: Canids along with contemporary illustrations and guides given to keep and feed foxes until hunt season.  However, I doubt that this 'conservation' of foxes would have helped the species survive. I would hazard an educated guess that it was during the 16th century that foxes were caught in Europe and sent to England to "replenish the stock" -this certainly went ion into the early 20th century.

And no one must misunderstand here; the 'lords and masters' hunted foxes for 'fun' and 'pleasure' and so did the common people with the added bonus of collecting bounties for the animals they killed (again detailed in The Red Paper). Fun and profit and a good session in the local pub afterwards.

As was written in 1575 so was written in the 1700s and repeatedly throughout the 19th century. 'Sportsmen' and naturalists all noted the decline of foxes and that they were headed for extinction and do you know what the biggest fear they had? "If foxes vanish then what shall happen to our sport?" This was never about 'pest control' and the term "Vermin" simply referred to animals one could hunt and the older term was "creatures of the chace".  Everyone from villagers to the upper class contributed to the extinction of the Old fox.

Stringer shows his true colours but was not using the term "vermine" as anything but an animal to hunt and kill. A more "noble" creature to hunt because the fox cornered and about to be torn to pieces would put up a fight and the things these 'sportsmen' wanted was a long chase and a "good end" and we read about it over and over again -whether fox, wolf, coyote or jackal the 'sportsman' wanted that fight at the end and one Duke of Beaufort on a wolf hunting holiday in France did not want the cornered wolf set loose to chase again -he demanded that it was strangled in front of him. Not very sporting.  A hare, although classed as a creature of the chace/vermin could not put up a fight for its life -where was the sexual excitement for the huntsman in that? 

Yes, the element of sexual excitement was always noted  (if politely) in the past. Former Prime Minister Boris Johnson also stated that there was a degree of sexual excitement involved.

We saw the last of the Old fox types (Mountain, Hill and Cur) die out by the 1830s, a period at the height of the "Golden Age of Hunting" that saw many species go extinct and replacements brought in from Europe. 

Rather like the wild cats of England, Scotland and Wales surviving until falling into extinction it is possible that the Old types hung on through breeding with the New imported foxes that escaped the hunts.

We can, therefore, show that the first extinction of foxes in England hit in the 16th century and it is possible that Old fox types after that were ones caught and transported around the country to hunting estates -in the 19th century hunts in England sent Mountain foxes to Ireland as they were vanishing/vanished there.  Once they were finished off England imported as many Norwegian Mountain foxes as they could get as these were sturdier and even faster than the then gone British Mountain fox.

I have tried, along with my colleague LM, to unravel the true history of British foxes but the use of DNA would answer so many questions that are otherwise only educated speculation.




NB: I ought to note that many old fox and wild cat illustrations are found online and for sale but have been miscoloured. The people making money from colouring the prints and selling them have no knowledge of Old foxes and simply colour using modern photos -some taxidermists are also 'rejuvenating' fox taxidermy by bleaching out the original fur colour and applying dyes to make a totally inaccurate specimen. Lack of knowledge is destroying a lot of Old fox taxidermy.

Sunday, 4 January 2026

Red Paper 2025


96 Pages

Print Book: A4 (8.27 x 11.69 in / 210 x 297 mm), 
Standard Color, 60# White — Uncoated, Paperback 
Perfect Bound, Glossy Cover
Price:£12.00 GBP

For decades there have been reports of “Big Cats” roaming the British countryside killing sheep and deer. Are all of the observers from naturalists,zoologists, zoo personnel, police and others all mistaken?

Terry Hooper-Scharf set up the Exotic Animals Register (EAR) in 1977 to disprove the claims before become a UK police forces exotic wildlife consultant and member of the Partnership Against Wildlife crime (PAWS).  What he found out was almost unbelievable but with the gathered evidence including DNA results and bone analysis it seemed that there were exotic cats in the UK and that some had been here at least going back to the early 19th century.

The presented evidence saw the Department of Environment Farming and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) force him off the PAWS scheme despite police protests.

Now read fact and not sensationalist press or fringe claims.

The Red Paper 2022 Volume II: Felids

 




226 pp
Paperback
Interior Color and Black and white
Dimensions  A4 (8.27 x 11.69 in / 210 x 297 mm)
https://www.lulu.com/shop/terry-hooper/the-red-paper-2022-volume-2-felids/paperback/product-n48529.html?
£25.00

In 1896 Scottish naturalists and zoologists declared that the true Scottish wild cat had become extinct by the 1860s. What we see today is nothing more than a wild tabby cat. In this work the true history and destruction of wild cats from England, Wales (where hybrids clung on into the 1940s) and Scotland is explored and after decades of research the true look of the wild cat is revealed. The "English Tiger" and "Highland Tiger" truly lived up to that name.

Dogma is finally thrown out.
There is also a look at the "New Native Cats" ranging from Asian Golden Cats, Lynx, Puma and others and the evidence leading to their being so designated. No silly press or media stories just solid facts backed up by evidence. The author acted as an exotic species wildlife consultant to UK police forces from 1977-2015 as well as cooperated with university projects on the subject.
Island cats as well as feral cats their lifestyles and problems mare also covered .
Fully referenced and including maps, illustrations and very rare photographs -some never before seen in print- make this a book for amateur naturalists and zoologists.

The Red Paper 2022 Volume I -Canids

 





361 pp
Paperback
Interior Color & Black and white
Dimensions A4 (8.27 x 11.69 in / 210 x 297 mm
£25.00
https://www.lulu.com/shop/terry-hooper/the-red-paper-2022-volume-1-canids/paperback/product-r97ywj.html?

 When the Doggerland bridge flooded the British Isles became separated from

Continental Europe and its wildlife developed uniquely. The British Isles, for the purpose of this work includes Ireland, and isolated the wolves on both became what would be island species not affected by the usual island dwarfism. These wolves, after millennia. Became “unwanted” and forests and woodland was burnt down or cut down for the specific purpose of lupicide; the killing of every and any wolf –and there was a bounty for “a job well done”. At the same time there also developed three unique island species of Old fox from the coyote-like Mountain or Greyhound fox, the slightly smaller but robustly built Mastiff or Bulldog fox and the smaller Common or Cur fox –the latter like today’s red foxes had a symbiotic relationship with humans. These canids were mainly ignored until it was decided that they could provide fur and meat and those things earn money. From that point onward, especially after all other game had been killed off, the fox faced what writers over the centuries referred to as vulpicide –extermination through bounties paid, trapping or hunting and despite all the hunters noting that the Old foxes were nearing extinction they continued to hunt until by the late 1880s the Old were gone and replaced by the New –foxes imported by the thousands every year for the ‘sport’ of fox hunting and this importation also led the the UK seeing the appearance of mange (unknown before the importations). The travelling British sportsmen went coyote, wolf and jackal hunting and on returning to England wanted to bring a taste of this to “the good old country”. Wolves, jackals and coyotes were set up in hunting territories from where they could learn the lay of the land and provide good sport later. Some hunts even attempted to cross-breed foxes, jackals and Coyotes. Then there were the legendary –almost mythical– “beasts”; the black beast of Edale, the killer canids of Cavan and the “girt dog” of Ennerdale. In more recent times raccoon dogs and arctic foxes have appeared in the UK; some released for ‘sport’ while others are exotic escapees long since established in the countryside. If you thought you knew what fox hunting was about prepare to be woken up by a sharp slap to the face and the reality that, by admissions of hunts themselves, this was all about fun and sport and nothing to do with “pest control”.

The UK is very hostile to naturalists who are not "in the magic circle."

I have made it clear before that the intended release of the full Bristol Fox Deaths Necropsy Study can not happen. Every official UK organisation involved supported the personal attacks and lies against me even when provided with legal documentation. The pathologist involved even attempted to close down my small publishing company which had nothing to do with fox matters.  Make no mistake; this was all supported by the silence of the bodies involved.

https://terryhoopernaturalist.blogspot.com/2025/03/threats-and-cyber-bullying-why-bristol.html 

A few recent problems had me try to find out why I was blocked from information that should be freely available and about other matters.  Firstly, I was officially blocked and all because I sent a rough draft copy of a report as promised for final comments. I am also told that there have been two attempts to close down my publishing business which the company I use to print my books realised were malicious.  I do not intend to run away and hide. I am not even going to try to fathom out why organisations allowed the necropsy study to take place if it did not want results known.  

All I know is that others are taking credit for the work I instigated and my name has been deleted from all reports. 

The UK is very hostile to naturalists who are not "in the magic circle."


Saturday, 3 January 2026

Results From The Bristol Fox Deaths and Bristol Badger Deaths Registers 2025

 

Results From The Bristol Fox Deaths and Bristol Badger Deaths Registers 2025

 

Compiled by Terry Hooper

British Fox Study (f 1976) and Bristol Badger Group (f 1994)


blacktowercg@hotail.com

 

With thanks to Sarah Mills and to those vets who have progressed beyond the “just foxes” attitude.  Also to Vale Wildlife Hospital who have helped treat and save the lives of foxes from Bristol.

 

Introduction.

 

2025 saw a record number of fox deaths within the City and County of Bristol with the greatest numbers killed by motor vehicles speeding and refusal by the City Council to tackle the problem.

 

When I started the British Fox Study I assumed that over the years more people would become interested in foxes and that citizens would become more active. We have feeders and also people who simply treat foxes and badgers as photo opportunities. The total lack of support from the large number of wildlife groups in the region has been very noticeable. There are, of course, individuals who will help out as and when they can and they deserve praise.

 

Just how many foxes may be dying onb Bristol roads we have tried to determine based on known statistical trends. Even though this is not a 100% accurate figure even if cut by 50% it is concerning and yet, for a City boasting of its environmental status and wildlife loving credentials, very few seem to care.  Each year the totals are released and other than one or two “Likes” the overwhelming trend is apathy and if wildlife groups are like this then  it is no surprise that species in the UK are in decline.

 

Sarah Mills, the Bristol Fox Lady, has worked tirelessly and has managed to treat and save so many foxes.

 

When you read the statistics just remember that this is one City and County and that fox death totals nation wide would be staggering. Badger deaths totals are just terrible to think about since the vast majority of deaths are based on bad science and political game playing.

 

Like the hedgehog, the badger and foxes are heading for extinction and the truth is that very few people care.

 

 

The 2025 Deaths Registers Analysis.

 

Despite pro hunt "conservation" groups and their often repeated claims in the press the fox population in the UK is far from "booming" and every night men and women go out to shoot anything they find with foxes  being popular. This is done simply for 'fun' because according to the law foxes can be killed only when threatening live stock and with no livestock within miles of where these people often congregate for their 'sport' there is no legitimacy to the constant killing.

 

What the total number of fox deaths is we cannot say. The attitude is that “If it’s dead why report it”  or people are just suffering self induced blindness to the dead animals they see.  It was decided that, based on the total number of deaths at the time, AI analysis would be used to attempt to find a total.

 

It wass estimated that the actual number of fox road deaths based on the 360 reported incidents would likely be in the range of 4,320 to 5,760 deaths, as reported incidents represent a significant underestimate of the true figure.   Research indicates that a substantial discrepancy between reported and actual wildlife road casualties and studies are  suggesting that the actual death rate can be 12 to 16 times higher than the number of corpses counted, especially from a moving vehicle.

 

This discrepancy is due to various factors, including predator removal of carcasses, road type, traffic volume, time of day, and weather conditions.

 

Applying the 12-16 times multiplier to your reported number of 360 you find that:

 

Lower estimate: 360 reported deaths * 12 = 4,320 actual deaths

 

Upper estimate: 360 reported deaths * 16 = 5,760 actual deaths

 

Overall, the actual number is likely far higher than the number of publicly reported incidents, which often only capture a small fraction of total wildlife road mortality. To be honest those totals were slightly higher than I had estimated and even halving the totals it is still a staggering loss.

 

I then used AI to try to estimate the number of badger deaths covering all of the Badger Death Registers and the AI response was again shocking:

 

If you have 222 reported badger road deaths, the actual number is significantly higher, as most wildlife fatalities go unreported.  All estimates suggest tens of thousands of badgers die on UK roads yearly, so your 222 is a valuable sample for tracking trends but represents a tiny fraction, requiring extrapolation (like 10-20x) to guess total impact, though the Badger Trust uses such reports to estimate over 50,000 badgers annually.

 

If we multiply 222 by 10 then we have an estimate of  2,220.  Taking 222 and multiplying by 20 we have an estimated total of 4,440. Considering the personal communications with drivers, locals and others I would suggest that  2,220 is ‘acceptable’ but even halving that figure to 1,110 should concern anyone with an interest in  conservation and the environment.

When it comes to post mortem studies of dead badgers none of those reported underwent one. From the very outset I was told an outright lie both verbally and via email by the pathologist involved. I was told that no necropsy could be carried out due to Health and Safety Executive ruling based oin the ‘risk’ from Bovine TB. Only in very suspicious de4aths could a necropsy be carried out and that would need to be in the pathologists garden away from the pathology lab.

 

It has emerged since that while I was being told this badger necropsies (badger origins unknown) were being carried out at the lab and still are. For this reason every dead badger was assessed as killed by road traffic which seemed likely considering where they were found. The exception being a badger found at the bottom of a small cliff after severe weather.

 

That there is a burgeoning population of foxes is a lie and statistics released by pro hunt groups are meant to bolster that lie.  It was the same thing that Hunts did in the 1940s through to the 1960s and pro hunt 'naturalists' made it very clear (with a wink and chuckle)  that the figures were exaggerated. If you bear that in mind:

 

“An estimated 70,000 to 80,000 foxes are killed annually by gamgekeepers (a proxy for "UK shooters") in Britain, according to data from the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust (GWCT)” -which, it needs to be pointed out is a pro hunt organisation and thusly recognised as being hunt biased.

 

The total number of foxes killed by all forms of shooting (by gamekeepers and other individuals) is more difficult to quantify precisely. One older estimate suggested around 80,000 foxes were shot and retrieved each year, with a further 115,000 deaths unaccounted for.

 

The older estimate goes back to when hunts were desperate and being constantly challenged by locals as well as by politicians  and in the press in the 1950s-1960s and the quoted figures given are taken out of context and without explanation from my own work!

 

One might ask how you can take "a further 115,000 deaths unaccounted for" ?

 

How can you state 115,000 dead foxes are "unaccounted for"? Either you have reports of those 115,000 dead foxes or it is a clear pointer to someone doctoring the numbers to keep the killing of foxes as being needed.

 

The truth is that fox numbers declined throughout the 20th century due to hunting and in many parts of Wales there are no foxes -wildlife photographers travel from across Wales to Bristol just to photograph foxes and will tell you that "We rarely get to see foxes in Wales" -one reason probably being snaring adding to the numbers killed.

 

There is no precise current official figure for foxes killed by snares in the UK, but estimates suggest a significant number, with older data pointing to tens of thousands (e.g., 9,500+ in 1995, or up to 39,000 managed by gamekeepers with 25% trapped by snares, potentially 9,750 annually). More broadly, reports indicate potentially millions of animals caught annually, with some sources suggesting up to 1.7 million animals (including foxes) caught in snares across England and Wales, highlighting the significant scale, though exact fox numbers remain elusive.

 

Then we have rodenticide deaths that affect many species that prey on rodents:

Exposure Rates are High: Studies analyzing fox livers have consistently found high rates of anticoagulant rodenticide (AR) residues. One study from the late 1990s found that 46% of a sample of 100 foxes had been exposed to rodenticides, and ten had died directly from the poisoning. More recent research (2011-2022) shows that exposure rates to some specific second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs), such as brodifacoum, may have increased since the introduction of stewardship schemes, with 43% of foxes exposed.

 

Secondary Poisoning: Foxes are primarily affected by secondary poisoning, which occurs when they eat poisoned rodents (such as rats and mice). Direct poisoning of foxes is illegal in Britain.

 

Sentinel Species: Foxes are considered a "sentinel species," meaning their high exposure levels act as an indicator of the widespread presence of these toxins in the environment and the risk to other wildlife.

 

Difficulty in Quantification: Determining the exact number of deaths is challenging because many poisoned foxes die in the wild or are killed by other causes (e.g., road traffic accidents) that can mask the signs of internal bleeding from the poison. Wildlife rescue charities frequently report cases of poisoned foxes but formal, national statistics are not collected.

 

While a precise annual number is unavailable, the high exposure rates and frequent anecdotal reports from wildlife organisations suggest that rodenticides are a major ongoing cause of mortality for the UK fox population.

 

Leptospirosis also takes a high toll of younger foxes and adding in "natural disease deaths" such as septicemia, kidney failure, mastitis, parasites such as worms and mange mites, cancer and when the vixen is killed and no other fox is around to feed cubs (an "aunt" fox or even dog fox) starving to death comes into the death rate -called "mismothering".

 

Determination of Sex

 

Out of the 375 known deaths some 77 were vixens and we cannot count the unknown number of cubs that died due to the lactating vixen being killed. Those cub deaths are technically termed “Mismothering”.

 

Some 121 known deaths involved Dog foxes. The higher rate of death may be due to the dispersal season as is usually claimed.  However, the deaths seem to have been consistently high from January to December. Various factors may be involved and one is the male taking turns at hunting because despite popular myth a “brace” (pair) do often stick together and in many cases there are leashes (a group of foxes) using the same dens or that have adjacent dens.

 

One vixen was noted going out and returning six times and each time carrying a rat, In other cases both dog and vixen take turns in hunting and in some cases where there are other vixens present they act as “Aunts” looking after cubs while the mother goes out hunting or will even bring back food for the nursing fox.  In cases where vixens have died the dog fox has been observed attempting to feed young.

 

Foxes are also naturally curious and well known wanderers when it comes to dog foxes so whereas the vixen having found a safe area to den may take up residence there on a permanent basis (only moving if she feels there is a threat to young cubs –at which point foxes “carrying of a pet cat” stories emerge as the cubs are misidentified) dog foxes mated and not mated can travel around a large area.

 

 

Causes of Death.

 

There are territorial fights and these can lead to infections and untreated death as organs are affected.  Although missing pieces of ear and even the odd scar from a fight (rather as with domestic cats fighting each other) the large number of facial injuries seem consistent and in many cases not fight associated but due to being swiped/hit by cars.

 

Leptospirosis reared its head again this year and out of all the foxes examined since 2021 not a single case of ‘rampant’ (“in British foxes”) adenovirus has been found.  It seems highly likely that any adenovirus was localised but as is usual amongst rescues it was grasped at to explain all unusual fox deaths and bypass any need to submit foxes for post mortem.  This seems reinforced by what happened after the Bristol fox deaths study when rescues again started claiming that any ill foxes with jaundice had “rampant leptospirosis” –just because there is jaundice present does not mean it is leptospirosis but could be due to a number of problems such as infected wounds leading to organ failure.

 

Cancer is found rarely in wild foxes but it has been noted in the work carried out. There were a number of cases of “emaciated foxes” dying but due to these not being allowed to be submitted there is no way of telling whether this was due to disease or some other problem.

 

Mange is not a big killer, at least in Bristol now (we lost 96% of the fox population to it in 1994/1995) as once reported it can be treated thanks to Sarah Mills’ dedication to foxes.  Prior to her taking on Bristol foxes the local rescue had a policy of euthenazing any fox with mange as standard.  Deaths do still occur as people who have observed foxes losing hair to the point of baldness and getting progressively worse do not report them until it is too late. There is absolutely no reason for these deaths and they happen because of people who are either anti fox or simply do not care.

 

 

Vets Attitude Regarding Foxes

 

In Bristol the once anti fox stance by vets has vanished to a degree and we have seen vets listen and even go well beyond what would be expected including scans as part of their first treatment of wildlife duties. A good number of vets are now more friendly to foxes submitted and will even consult regarding sick foxes.

 

This is still a long way from the attitude that a leg injury of any kind means a fox needs to be killed –three legged foxes thrive in the wild and even raise cubs successfully.  Facial injuries we have shown can be successfully treated in the wild and it is good to see some rescues actually treating facial wounds albeit in foxes confined.

 

Another thing vets are learning is to not misjudge fox weights when treating or medicating. Vets often vastly over estimated fox weights basing them on pet dog standard weights. Weights should be looked at from a cat size perspective.

 

 

Determined Weight (kg) of Foxes

 

Where known we have ascertained the weight of dead foxes and it is now standard to have any submitted to vets weighed. .  For those foxes we do know the weights for 6 kgs is at the top level of weight and the 9 kgs is a rarity

 

 

Known Dog  Fox Weights

 

1.5                                 

1.7

2.0

2.2

2.2

3.0

3.2

3.2

3.3

3.4

3.5

3.5

3.9

3.9

4.0

4.0

4..0

4.2

4.2

4.2

4.2

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.82

4.9

4.9

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.1

5.2

5.3

5.3

5.4

5.5

5.5

5.5

5.5

5.7

5.7

5.9

5.9

5.9

5.9

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.1

6.2

6.2

6.2

6.4

6- 6.5

6.5

6.7

8.4

9.3

 

Known Vixen Weights

 

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.6

2.8

2.8

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.3

3.3

3.4

3.4

3.5

3.5

3.6

3.7

3.9

3.9

3.9

4.0

4.2

4.2

4.2

4.4

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.6

4.9

5.0

5.0

5.2

5.2

5.2

5.5

5.6

 

 

 

   NB: one fox at 4.5kg had “back end destroyed so cannot register as dog fox

 or vixen

 

And talking about badger deaths there are the results of the unscientific cull of badgers in just the Avon  (we went back to City and County of Bristol in 1995):

During the 2022 badger cull in the Avon area (Area 44), 1,162 badgers were removed by controlled shooting, exceeding the updated minimum target of 948 badgers, with similar intense culling continuing in other Avon zones as part of the government's strategy to control bovine TB in cattle.

I would estimate that the number of badgers killed each year on Bristol roads is far more likely to be around 150-200.

 

This cannot go on as we are losing the hedgehog, the fox and the badger in such numbers that like many other UK species they are heading for extinction by the 2030s.  We have had extinctions before and the major extinction event was the 1860s when the wild cats, Old type British foxes, various deer, squirrels and other species were hunted despite it being widely written and commented on that they were going extinct.


Wildlife blog stats 2026 -some surprises

  Looking at which countries visit my blogs most in the last 7 days so lower than normal due to Christmas and New Year. If it were depende...