Facts, Figures and Solution Offering - Apparently None of This Matters

 On the British Fox and Wild Canid Study blog on 7th January, 2024 I posted this:

How Many Animals Killed On UK Roads Each Year -it should keep you awake at night

National Road Death Survey The Mammal Society 2001

There have been warnings that common mammal species such as hedgehogs, badgers and hares might be declining and face local extinction in certain parts of Europe primarily due to road casualties. In Britain annual road casualties are estimated to account for 100,000 foxes, 100,000 hedgehogs, 50,000 badgers and 30,000-50,000 deer. There is also concern regarding particular bird of prey species such as the barn owl, which is dramatically over-represented in the total number of wildlife road casualties compared with other bird of prey species. For these reasons, The Mammal Society, in collaboration with the Hawk and Owl Trust, undertook a nationwide survey to identify trends in road and habitat characteristics associated with mammal and bird of prey wildlife road casualties.

For one year, in 2000/2001, 281 volunteers from across Britain recorded wild mammal and bird of prey casualties on all road categories except designated trunk roads and motorways, which were excluded on the grounds of safety. A number of habitat and road characteristic variables were recorded at each casualty location including the speed limit, proximity to a bend, presence or absence of a connecting wildlife corridor (e.g. a stream, railway line or hedgerow), and the adjacent land use, verge habitats and highway boundary features Regional differences in casualty rates were also investigated. Volunteers were also requested to record road and habitat data at non- casualty locations along their route so that characteristics occurring disproportionately more frequently at casualty locations than at non-casualty locations could be identified.

Volunteers recorded 5675 mammal casualties and 142 bird of prey casualties. Figures 1 and 2 show the principal mammal and bird of prey road casualty species as proportions of the total number of casualties. The hedgehog was the most numerous mammal casualty recorded (29% of mammal casualties), followed by badger (25%) and fox (19%). The most numerous bird of prey road casualty recorded was the tawny owl (25% of casualties), followed by kestrel (19%) and then barn owl (16%). Casualties as a proportion of British pre-breeding population size were highest for the badger, fox and barn owl.

Habitat and road features influencing the presence/absence of wildlife road casualties are shown in Table 1. The casualty locations of a number of mammal species, including fox, badger and muntjac, and also the barn owl and kestrel were associated with adjacent linear habitat features that connect with road verges and thus funnel wildlife toward traffic. High traffic speed increased the likelihood of many mammal species, including fox, badger and roe deer, and also the tawny owl, falling victim to vehicles as it reduces the time available for drivers and animals to react to danger. Adjacent land use and region were important factors influencing wildlife road casualty locations and appeared to reflect foraging activity and population density. For example, roe deer and tawny owl road casualties were associated with adjacent woodland habitat and badger casualties were disproportionately high in the south-west of England.

Due to the impact of road casualties it has been suggested that barn owls are unable to sustain viable breeding populations in close proximity to trunk roads and motorways and that road casualties may even be responsible for suppressing the populations of some of our common mammal species on a local scale. There are also a significant number of human fatalities and a considerable economic cost associated with collisions between vehicles and wildlife. There is therefore, a conservation and economic argument for substantial investment in wildlife accident prevention. This study has highlighted typical casualty hotspot locations where such mitigation measures should be implemented.

We are extremely grateful for the tremendous effort of all the volunteers who participated in the survey, all of whom will be sent a summary report in the near future.

By Lincoln Garland

Figure 1. Mammal road casualty proportions

 

 

 Figure 2. Bird of prey road casualty proportions

 

 The 4% between unknown and little owl pertains to sparrowhawks

Table 1. Habitat and road features influencing the presence/absence of wildlife road casualties

 

	Adjacent verge habitat	Adjacent land use	Adjacent highway boundary	Connecting Wildlife corridor	Road speed limit	Proximity to a road bend	Region
Mammals	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
Hedgehog	ns	√ (urban)	√ (ditch)	ns	ns	ns	ns
Hare	ns	√ (arable)	√ (ditch)	ns	ns	√ (no bend)	√ (north England)
Grey squirrel	√ (wooded)	√ (urban and woodland)	ns	ns	ns	ns	√ (south-east)
Rat	ns	√ (urban)	ns	ns	ns	√ (on bend)	ns
Fox	ns	ns	ns	√	√	ns	ns
Stoat	ns	ns	√ (ditch)	√	√	ns	ns
Weasel	ns	ns	ns	√	ns	ns	ns
Polecat/ferret	ns	√ (pasture)	ns	√	ns	ns	ns
Mink	ns	ns	ns	√	ns	ns	ns
Badger	ns	√ (pasture)	√ (ditch & hedge)	√	√	ns	√ (south-west)
Roe deer	ns	√ (woodland)	√ (ditch)	ns	√	ns	ns
Muntjac	√ (wooded)	ns	√ (ditch and treeline)	√	√	ns	ns
Birds of prey	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
Kestrel	ns	√ (arable)	ns	√	ns	ns	ns
Barn owl	ns	√ (arable)	√ (no hedge)	√	ns	ns	ns
Tawny owl	ns	√ (woodland)	ns	ns	√	ns	ns

ns – non-significant

√ - significant

Here we have to remember that these are just reports gathered through volunteers and so fox 19% and badger 25% seems to be a little off when the Society states that an estimated 100,000 foxes and 50,000badgers are killed each year on UK roads. In fact, animals killed on roads or being hit by cars are rarely reported as the attitude exists that "animals should not be on the road" and "what's the point of reporting a dead animal?" -something I hear all too often. 

For a country calling itself a "nation of animal lovers" this is literally widespread slaughter on an industrial scale when put alongside hundreds of mammals (and birds) killed each week for shooters 'sport' and the 'legal; killing of 250,000 badgers to stop supposed bovine TB spread. 

With road casualties we know that otters, foxes, badgers and deer are killed daily and in many cases along certain and very specific stretches of road. Yet, there is, unlike most wildlife conscious countries, no use or building of wildlife over or underpasses to stop the casualties. Why not? It might cause a few delays in journeys during building? That is far more preferable than having to record more and more wildlife deaths especially of protected species such as otters and badgers.

Just from the 2023 Bristol Fox and Badger Death Registers we can highlight the areas/roads where most deaths occur and when it comes to otters we know the main road where deaths happen. The UKs local and national 'policies' on environment and conservation are a joke at best and a smoke screen/lie at worse.

Firstly, it might be worth the Home Office examining the widespread use of firearms for 'sport' because on most of the shooters' online pages they brag about the wildlife (and other animals) they have killed and post photographs of themselves with their 'trophies' and yet, the law states (in the case of foxes for instance) that they may be "controlled" if a threat top livestock. So the killing of "hundreds" according to 'sportsmen' of foxes every month is illegal -what livestock are foxes able to take down (and ignore the false lamb claim) especially on the outskirts of towns and cities where foxes mainly feed on rodents and wild rabbits?

Why are fox numbers tumbling i9n the UK? Well, traffic for one and the other is the killing of breeding pairs of foxes as well as cubs.  The number of vixens we record being killed by cars alone shows that there are simply not enough to continue breeding a strong and healthy population and so many are suffering from illnesses and not recovering -the 100,000 per year is looking a tad slim compared to the probable actual number of fox deaths each year in total.

And, yes, I am aware that some shooters include off duty police officers so perhaps the blind eye of the law is blind for a reason?

We need to tackle decline in wildlife while we still can and when you also consider that Mammal Society report was from 2001 and that traffic has increased greatly since then it becomes something that should keep people concerned with wildlife and conservation up at night. It does me.

We need to construct wildlife underpasses and regulate shooting for 'sport'.  We also need to legally come down hard on estates and those who allow the killing of protected and reintroduced birds of prey etc. That or just watch as wildlife disappear.

Then, on the 30th February 2025 I posted this:

How Much Wildlife Can One City Kill And Not Care About?

 I have just completed a 59pp document that combines the 2022-(Feb) 2025 Fox and Badger deaths registers. It is grim reading.

Well over 600 foxes and over 150 badgers and, as I keep saying, these are only the reported deaths. You could probably double both totals.

In the last week Sarah Mills (Bristol Wildlife Rescue) had call outs to three RTA vixens who were aborting still born cubs.  There was also a heavily pregnant sow boar.

The persistence of local authorities to not put in place road under./overpasses for wildlife or speed bumps on the worse roads (where evening and night time "racers" kill a lot of wildlife) really shows the lack of intertest and concern.  "We have no budget for this" is always the response while always calling out what "champions for the environment and re-wilding" they are.

It has to change because we are losing too much wildlife -foxes, badgers, deer, otters, hedgehogs and more.

____________________________________________________

What did this achieve?  When the Green Party running Bristol City Council was sent a report on wildlife deaths it was "concerning" but fobbed off with the excuse that it would cost money. You can read about that exchange here https://foxwildcatwolverineproject.blogspot.com/2025/03/time-to-stop-playing-nice-with-local.html

 The Green Party states as item 3 of "Our Core Values":

1. Humankind depends on the diversity of the natural world for its existence. We do not believe that other species are expendable.

There is an article on The Green Party page "Nature Is In Crisis" and, yes, it is in crisis and in Bristol we are seeing deer, foxes, badgers, hedgehogs, birds of prey, otters and other species being killed by road users and this is tackled as a priority in many other countries.

The Green Party was voted in by many people who believed the promises and it is time that the Party actually steps up and becomes pro-active or sit back and accept the responsibility for doing nothing to try to save the wildlife that is important to our environment. But instead the are looking at developing homes on Green sites and attracting more business development which means money -far more important than any wildlife or even human cost? 

According to the Bristol City Council Road Casualty Review 2023 (my highlights):

"This report focuses on road collisions in Bristol that have been reported to the local police force and which resulted in either a fatality or a personal-injury (all referred to as casualties).  In 2023, there were 939 reported casualties (including 8 fatalities), this was 130 lower than the previous year.  

"There were 8 fatal casualties - a level that is equal to the recent (2013 to 2022) long-term average for Bristol’s roads of 8 deaths per year. "

What it seems that BCC are ignoring because it might cost money is that there are long stretches of road in Bristol used every night and especially more so at weekends, as "race tracks" and places where a driver can "put their foot down". In the small area I am in, which is far away from central Bristol, every night car breaks and speeding can be heard and at weekends it gets worse. The most basic way to stop speeding is the use of road bumps. Drivers hate them because they cannot speed above the legal limit. Even a wildlife rescuer in high-visibility gear had cars speeding past and had near miss incidents -on a suburban city road where people might also be crossing.

But, The Green Party Council has ignored all of this and their response to the follow up and noting human casualties was...to not respond. Which says a lot about their attitude and priorities.

As we see badgers, foxes and hedgehogs roll on to extremely rare or extinction around the UK the Green Party Bristol City Council can boast that it did its best in not giving a damn.

More Wildlife Shame for the European Union: "Kill Turtle Doves!"

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/turtle-doves-shot-sport-again-133947867.html

 Re-introduce wild cats. Re-introduce wolves. Re-introduce lynx. Re-introduce.,..well, you get the point. No matter where efforts are made to save a species almost driven to extinction by humans or are re-introduced to replace a species wiped out by humans as soon as it starts working -"Oh you can kill them now" always inevitably follows. 

Some people with money or psychopathic tendencies (or both) and some greedy politician will "work things out".

UK a nation of animal lovers and yet where are the mass protests or outrage at 300,000 badgers being slaughtered (as a scapegoat species) over bad science to shift the blame for bovine TB away from the real culprits?

Every night men and women (a few off duty police officers included) in the UK go out to shoot and kill foxes for 'fun'. Why are people allowed to do this and why are these people (who will kill any animal to get their kicks) be allowed to carry fire arms in the UK?

Foxes and badgers are now on the brink of extinction -as are hedgehogs that are NOT "recovering"- and all because of humans. Drivers mow down many thousands of wildlife (and pets) each year in the UK and how many report hitting an animal on the road? If it was 1% it would be a surprise.

The EU oversaw the return/recovery of wolves and now with corrupt politicians and wealthy people wanting to hunt again it seems that the EU is going to show that it is no better than the United States in allowing killing for fun and financial gain.    Oh, how the UK 'sportsmen/women' are going to love Turtle dove shooting -something rare and it will do until they can locate wild cats or any re-introduced large predators such as lynx or wolves.

Once a country exterminates a species while no one complains then that species is gone and should never be re-introduced. Badgers and foxes will become rare and even extinct in some areas by the 2030s (rather like foxes exterminated by humans for fun in Wales are).  

Now the psychopaths can go blasting away at Turtle doves. More wildlife shame for the European Union

Helena Horton and Ajit Niranjan

The EU will allow hunters to shoot 132,000 birds in Spain, France and Italy.Photograph: MikeLane45/Getty Images/iStockphoto

Turtle doves will be allowed to be shot for sport again across Europe, as the EU lifts a ban on hunting that was credited with the species’ tentative recovery.

The EU will allow hunters to shoot 132,000 birds across Spain, France and Italy after the threatened bird enjoyed a population boom in western Europe because of a hunting ban that came into effect in 2021.

The gentle pigeon species, which mate for life with their partners, is on the brink of extinction in the UK, where it is the fastest declining bird species. Globally the bird is classed as vulnerable to extinction because of hunting and habitat loss.

Every year it flies from sub-Saharan Africa across the continent of Europe to breed in the UK and other northern European countries in summer, and in some countries, such as Spain and Italy, people shoot them for sport during their migration.

Related: Wild bird numbers continue ‘alarming’ decline in UK, Defra figures show

But after a temporary ban three years ago on the annual shoot of the migratory birds as they pass through France, Spain and Portugal, there has been a remarkable 25% increase in the bird’s western European population, which includes the 2,000 individuals in England.

According to the BirdLife International charity, the data shows that bans on hunting are successful in boosting populations. In the western flyway of Spain, France, Portugal, and north-west Italy, the dove has started to recover. But in the central-eastern flyway of Austria, Bulgaria, Greece, Italy, Malta, Romania and Cyprus, where hunting bans have not been properly enforced, no recovery has been observed.

Barbara Herrero, the senior nature conservation policy officer at BirdLife Europe, said: “The turtle dove did its part. Left alone, it started to recover. But governments failed to uphold their end of the deal. Instead of fixing weak enforcement and protecting habitats, they’re rushing to lift the ban. This is reckless and shortsighted. We know where this path leads – straight back to the brink. The European Commission should have stood firm and kept the moratorium.”

European hunters say efforts to bolster turtle dove numbers have paid off, and argue they have a strong cultural and economic attachment to hunting them.

Massimo Buconi, the president of the Italian Hunting Federation, said turtle doves have traditionally been used to open the Veneto hunting season, describing the celebrations as “an important day that is celebrated like the first day of the football season”.

“Of course, we eat the doves,” he added. “Hunting in Italy has always been closely linked to the kitchen.”

In Spain, where the “maximal harvest” of turtle doves under the new recommendations exceeds 100,000, the bird is classified as game because it can be hunted sustainably and serves a social, traditional, economic, culinary or cultural purpose, said Alejandro Martínez from the Royal Spanish Hunting Federation.

“Hunting in Spain generates €6.5bn and 200,000 jobs,” he said. “This serves as a driving force for development in rural areas that subsist and prosper thanks to the use of species like the turtle dove.”

Minutes from the meeting held by the commission in which officials decided to allow hunting to take place show that EU leaders believe the conditions have been met to allow sustainable shooting of the doves.

They say the conditions to reopen hunting are a population increase of at least two years, an increase in survival, and the existence of credible regulatory, control and enforcement systems. They believe these conditions have been met and will therefore allow 1.5% of the turtle dove population to be killed.

The minutes read: “There was consensus (with the exception of Estonia and BirdLife) to reopen hunting with the 1.5% quota in the western flyway. Meanwhile, the reaction of the birds’ population to the hunting take will need to be closely monitored in the next years.”